Home > Failed To > Failed To Contact Local Rpcbind Server Error 5

Failed To Contact Local Rpcbind Server Error 5

Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. The only course of action we can find is reboot. I'm guessing that an IPv6 address is being given to the kernel, so it tries to talk to rpcbind, but as only portmap is listening, it has problems. A locking failure between two writers is likely to cause data loss/corruption, as the later write overwrites the earlier one. Check This Out

mount: mounting 192.168.1.10:/home/user/share on /mnt failed: Input/output error This means that filesystem used on your hardware is not running rpc.lockd daemon. The following two tabs change content below.BioLatest Posts charlie rootVP of keeping it real / HNIC at pissedoffadmins.com I bring the cold coffee. The error message "No locks available" would seem that the file locks are a finite resource, and all the available locks are in use. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. 0 Crash recovery Started by hiimbob , Mar 04 2009 10:15 AM Please log in to reply No replies to this topic #1 hiimbob https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/16474/

Search this Thread 11-10-2007, 09:00 AM #1 rushadrenaline Member Registered: Nov 2006 Location: Bangalore,New delhi Distribution: RHEL5, Kubuntu, Mandriva 2008 Posts: 69 Rep: "service nfs start " not working You might also take a look at the logs of the NFS server, to see if there are any locking-related messages. Any ideas? >>>>> >>>>> What troubleshooting steps have you taken? If another host accesses the same files as your application on this host, there may be problems if file lock information exchange is disabled.

Add Your Comment Your Comment Change mind? Of particular interest to you is the ability of the kernel to print out the ip of a client that is giving the server lockd problems. lockd_up: makesock failed, error=-5 ^CRPC: failed to contact local rpcbind server (errno 512). 解决方法: 挂载NFS的时候,加上参数-o nolock 2010.4.28 阅读全文 © 2015 Gooth 软件开发程序员博客文章收藏网 首页 android java linux matlab mysql oracle mount 错误 Start with the default configuration for the OMAP3EVM.

Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results. Password Mandriva This Forum is for the discussion of Mandriva (Mandrake) Linux. Paul Follow-Ups: Re: NFS statd fails to start From: Stuart Sears References: NFS statd fails to start From: Paul Smith Re: NFS statd fails to start From: Aldo Foot Re: NFS Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.

httpd is stopped [FAILED] Firewall is stopped. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know. Thanks, Aldo. I unblocked port 111, but now I need to fix and unblock some other ports.

Since you are not the original submitter, are you hitting the same problem? https://bugs.pcbsd.org/issues/927 First ensure that you are able to mount the path /home/user/nfs_share. Rebooting both the server and client fixes it, until the client tries it again. Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org?

The client that is causing this is Apple OS X, and it seems to have been brought on by trying to share our photo archive and letting iPhoto create its library his comment is here hmmm. Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started Light Design convoluted theory flash voodoo i like to shoot Ju Mike or Michael ?

  • Thans man rushadrenaline View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Visit rushadrenaline's homepage!
  • Using the nolock option is required if the NFS server has its NFS file lock functionality in a broken or unimplemented state, but it works between any versions of NFS.
  • OMAP3503 is chosen as default processor.

Assuming default behaviour ('no_subtree_check'). This has to be used with some old NFS servers that don't support locking (for example servers running Red Hat Linux 5.2 or older). ypbind is stopped zumastor is NOT running Back to top Back to General Reply to quoted postsClear Cookie Alert This site uses cookies!By continuing to use this site, you agree this contact form There definitely seems to be an issue with lockd or statd on this version of FreeNAS.

How to choose the correct configuration for the processors in the OMAP35x family? Comment 3 Kees Cook 2008-12-19 16:24:16 UTC What would you recommend as the best way to further diagnose this problem? Find More Posts by rushadrenaline 11-12-2007, 11:27 AM #6 guillomovitch LQ Newbie Registered: Nov 2007 Posts: 2 Rep: What about doing things in order ? 1) launch either portmap

guillomovitch View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by guillomovitch 11-25-2007, 01:01 AM #7 rushadrenaline Member Registered: Nov 2006 Location: Bangalore,New

We had had no problems with NFS up until that point. #11 Updated by Xin Li over 4 years ago Replying to [comment:10 jgreco]: No, because even if there had been In my case the problem was that the server firewall was blocking ports I needed. Name* : Email* : URI : Wordpress Hashcash needs javascript to work, but your browser has javascript disabled. Thanks! #17 Updated by Ash Gokhale 5 months ago related: HPD-939-45858included collateral includes cores and extensive debugging. #18 Updated by Ash Gokhale 3 months ago And again with centos: OWF-338-92811 Also

Comment 4 Neil Brown 2008-12-22 14:45:06 UTC tcpdump -i lo -s 0 -w /tmp/tcp & strace -e mount -f -s 1000 mount server:/storage/thing on /mnt/thing -t nfs ..... See Running PowerTOP on OMAP35x platform for more details on executing this utility on OMAP35x platforms. LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Mandriva "service nfs start " not working User Name Remember Me? navigate here Having read the argument in the launchpad report, please do note that neither rpcbind nor libtirpc are part of nfs-utils.

This will most likely be a non-issue with NFSv4 because NFSv4 is a stateful protocol -- unlike v2 and v3 -- but I could be wrong. #2 Updated by nabbebx - You should _not_ be enabling SUNRPC_REGISTER_V4 if you are running a legacy portmapper.